Prediction of Marjorie Cox Crawford vs Minnie Richardson Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
M. Cox Crawford vs M. Richardson

Marjorie Cox Crawford

AUS

2

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

128

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Minnie Richardson

AUS

2

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

128

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Head-to-head: Crawford 2 - 0 Richardson

They have played 4 sets in total, with Marjorie Cox Crawford winning 4 and Minnie Richardson winning 0. The last match between Marjorie Cox Crawford and Minnie Richardson was at the Melbourne, 28-11-1926, Round: , Surface: Grass, with Marjorie Cox Crawford getting the victory 6-1 6-0.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Crawford	2
Richardson	0

Last 2 H2H Matches:

() Melbourne(11-28-26)

Stats

Marjorie Cox Crawford

Minnie Richardson

() Australian Championships(01-24-26)

Stats

Marjorie Cox Crawford

Minnie Richardson

M. C. Crawford vs M. Richardson H2H Profile

M. C. Crawford	Stats	M. Richardson
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
68.22% (73-34)	Career Total W/L	65.38% (17-9)
2	Grass	0
2	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

M. C. Crawford vs M. Richardson Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Marjorie Cox Crawford has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Minnie Richardson has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Marjorie Cox Crawford, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Minnie Richardson has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Marjorie Cox Crawford has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Minnie Richardson has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Marjorie Cox Crawford has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Minnie Richardson winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Marjorie Cox Crawford has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 80% (W/L 4/1), and worse career win % on N/A, winning 63% (W/L 12/7). Minnie Richardson has their best career surface win % on N/A, winning 80% (W/L 9/1), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 50% (W/L 8/8).
Player level: In the last year, Marjorie Cox Crawford has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Minnie Richardson has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Marjorie Cox Crawford winning 2 times and Minnie Richardson being victorious 0 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Marjorie Cox Crawford winning 4 and Minnie Richardson winning 0.
The last match between Marjorie Cox Crawford and Minnie Richardson was at the Melbourne, 28-11-1926, Round: , Surface: Grass, with Marjorie Cox Crawford getting the victory 6-1 6-0.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Marjorie Cox Crawford has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Minnie Richardson has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Marjorie Cox Crawford has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Minnie Richardson has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Marjorie Cox Crawford has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Minnie Richardson has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Marjorie Cox Crawford vs Minnie Richardson Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

M. C. Crawford vs M. Richardson H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

M. C. Crawford	Stats	M. Richardson
2	H2H Matches Won	0
4	Sets Won	0
24	Games Won	5
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
100% (2/2)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/2)
100% (2/2)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/2)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/2)

Recent Performance Stats

M. C. Crawford Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Sydney - 01-02-1930
R4 Emily WestacottE. Westacott	L	6-3 6-2	Stats
R3 Unknown PlayerU. Player	W	6-1 6-0	Stats
Sydney Interstate - 31-01-1930
Robin Gladys ToyneG. Toyne	W	6-3 6-3	Stats
Robin Sylvia LanceS. Lance	L	6-4 7-5	Stats
Australian Championships - 18-01-1930
R4 Peter SmithP. Smith	W	9-7 6-0	Stats

View All

M. Richardson Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Hobart Southern Tasmanian Chps - 29-12-1927
SF Adeline MoranA. Moran	L	6-3 6-2	Stats
Australian Championships - 22-01-1927
R4 Beryl SpowersB. Spowers	L	6-4 6-3	Stats
Hobart Southern Tasmanian Chps - 27-12-1926
F Frances Hoddle WrigleyF. Hoddle	L	6-3 6-3	Stats
Melbourne - 28-11-1926
R3 Joan McarthurJ. Mcarthur	W	6-4 6-2	Stats
R4 Mavis MciverM. Mciver	W	6-4 6-3	Stats

View All

M. C. Crawford vs M. Richardson Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

M. C. Crawford	Stats	M. Richardson
68.22% (73/34)	YTD Win/Loss	65.38% (17/9)
64.29% (153/85)	Sets Win/Loss	60.00% (33/22)
56.05% (1250/980)	Games Win/Loss	53.02% (272/241)
80.00% (4/1)	Clay Win/Loss	0% (0/0)
68.67% (57/26)	Grass Win/Loss	50.00% (8/8)
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
57.14% (8/6)	Slam W/L	50.00% (4/4)
69% (72/105)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	64% (16/25)
72% (18/25)	Deciding Set Win %	80% (4/5)
94% (64/60)	1st Set Won, Won Match	100% (13/13)
6% (64/4)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (13/0)
31% (42/13)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	25% (12/3)